At Palazzo Strozzi, Fra Angelico’s work does not overwhelm you all at once. It insists — and eventually reshapes how you look at everything else.
When I
returned from Florence, I realized that for the first time after many visits I
couldn’t dismiss the experience with the usual “beautiful, as always.”
Something was different—more physical, less rational. A mild dizziness, a sense
of emotional overload, the difficulty of holding together images, colors,
faces. In other words, I had experienced firsthand what we tend to call, in a
somewhat journalistic but effective shorthand, the “Stendhal syndrome.”
It wasn’t
my first time at the Uffizi. In fact, it was my ninth or tenth visit—I’ve lost
count. And yet, it was precisely this familiarity that made the experience even
more surprising. One would expect habituation, routine, perhaps a bit of
cynicism. Instead, the opposite happened. Walking through the galleries,
standing before works I thought I “knew,” I felt a kind of short circuit: my
brain said “already seen,” but my eyes and my body reacted as if it were the
first time.
The breaking point came shortly afterward, at Palazzo Strozzi, with the exhibition devoted to Fra Angelico—one of the artists I love most, and for that very reason one I believed I approached with a settled, almost pacified familiarity. The opposite occurred. His figures, the light that does not describe but reveals, the almost disarming calm of the sacred scenes produced a cumulative effect. Not a sudden shock, but a gradual loss of critical distance. I was no longer simply “looking at” artworks; I was inside a density of meaning that strained the limits of rational attention.
Stendhal
syndrome—first described by the French writer after a visit to Florence,
standing before the frescoes of Santa Croce—is not a disease in the clinical
sense. It is, rather, an extreme reaction to an excess of beauty concentrated
in space and time. Dizziness, rapid heartbeat, confusion, deep emotion.
Symptoms that, read coldly, sound almost exaggerated. And yet, when they occur,
they feel entirely understandable.
Why does
this happen? The simplest explanation is also the most concrete: Florence is a
city that does not dilute its heritage—it accumulates it. Within a few hundred
square meters, one moves from Giotto to Caravaggio, from Botticelli to
Michelangelo, without transition. Our perceptual system, accustomed to a
constant but fragmented flow of stimuli, suddenly finds itself facing an
extraordinarily dense concentration of meaning. It’s like moving from a
low-calorie diet straight into a Renaissance banquet without preparation.
There is,
however, another aspect—one particularly relevant for people oriented toward
reality and practical decision-making. This experience is not an abstract
luxury; it is a tangible investment in one’s personal capital: time, attention,
emotional energy. Resources that in daily life we tend to ration or squander.
Deliberately exposing oneself to beauty—real beauty, not filtered through a
screen—is a way to recalibrate priorities, to restore a hierarchy of what truly
matters.
There is no
need to be an art historian, nor especially “spiritual.” I am not. What is
required is simply a willingness to slow down and, paradoxically, to avoid
over-optimizing the experience. Entering the Uffizi with the anxiety of seeing
everything, of checking off masterpieces like items on a list, is the surest
way to feel nothing at all. Stendhal syndrome—if we want to call it
that—arrives when we allow ourselves the right to stop in front of a work that
calls to us, ignoring everything else for a few minutes.
The same applies to the exhibition devoted to Fra Angelico, including the extension hosted at the Convent of San Marco, which houses the artist’s frescoes, among them the famous and magnificent Annunciation. The exhibition is not spectacular in the modern sense; it does not aim for the “wow effect.” It is made of silences, balance, a beauty that does not assault but insists. Precisely for this reason, it demands a different kind of availability: less consumption, more listening. And at a certain point, the body responds before the mind.
My
invitation to readers is simple and practical: go to Florence not “to see,” but
to experience. Plan less, leave room for the unexpected, even accept the
discomfort of feeling overwhelmed. This is not wasted time, nor an aesthetic
indulgence. It is a very concrete way of stepping out of the automatic mode in
which we so often live and work.
In an age
in which everything is measurable, monetizable, performance-driven, allowing
oneself an experience that produces no immediate, tangible result is almost a
countercultural act. But that is precisely the point. Beauty, when it is
authentic, does not serve a purpose—it acts. And when it truly acts, it can
make your head spin, your heart race, and call apparently solid certainties
into question.
If it happens to you, don’t worry. It is neither weakness nor suggestion. It is the sign that, at least for a moment, you were fully present. And today, perhaps, there is no more profitable investment than that


.jpg)